II.2.5_errata
1/27/2022
Well, that didn't turn out so well, hahahahahaha. Yes, I got slightly overconfident
there and genuinely thought I could solve it in time, and ended up embarassing
myself. Traumatic. Ahh, yes, I can still hear the Jeopardy music. (cue the part at
2:58 when I wrote "OKAY. I GOT IT.").
Well, I did figure it out later that night... although I'm posting this like 3 days
late because I got lazy. Woops. And thus, we are at the VERY FIRST ERRATA
OF HARTSHORNED II. WOOOOOOOO *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*.
It ain't Hartshorned without some good old fashioned errata posts. Remember
those?
"WTF"
Anyway, since I already framed the problem in the last post, I can just pick up
from there. That's right; the errata motto: IF YOU DROP THE BALL, PICK IT
BACK UP. Here's how the story goes. We can actually use initiality of Z again!!!
there's a unique morphism.
Z → X(U ∩ V ) |
And hence if you localize, the induced local morphisms
ϕP* : Z ϕ(P) | → AP | ||
ψP* : Z ψ(P) | → BP |
are unique. so that Zϕ(P) ≃ Zψ(P)
ϕ(P) = ψ(P). DONE.
"...It took you 3 days to upload that?"
Well, excuuuuuse me princess reader. I'll (try to) upload a post everyday this
weekend to make up for it: FRIDAY, SATURDAY, SUNDAY. Are ya happy
now, chump? Ready to get your head BASHED with Hartshorned this weekend?
Prepare your brain for some very fancy ero guro.